Is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to make a package for apt that makes apt believe file roller
is installed when really, it is a symbolic link for engrampa
which would take less disk space than file-roller would?
I’m honestly not against file-roller
in any significant way, it is just; engrampa
has feature parity with file-roller
right? If it does, I see no sense in forcing the user to decide between one and the other if what is supplied is both sufficient and of a user’s preference. So a package that includes a bit of software to convert arguments for file-roller
so engrampa
can understand (if necessary) and a means to link engrampa
so it also acts as file-roller
would be a great thing to have for people who outright despise redundancy that leads to system bloat.
(Hehe, coming from the same person who dedicated a fair portion of his life here to writing about how to install nemo
with minimal deps but that’s because I consider nemo
a functionally superior FM.)